FTMO

FTMO is the reference point for the entire prop trading sector - the firm most competitors define themselves against, and the one whose rules became the industry template. Its 2-Step structure of a 10% target followed by a 5% verification, bounded by a 5% daily loss limit and a 10% maximum loss, has been copied so widely that most forex prop firms are recognisably variations on it. Two developments reshaped FTMO in 2026. The first was corporate: in December 2025 it acquired OANDA, a regulated broker, which routes its US offering through FTMO-group, NFA-regulated infrastructure. In a sector where almost every firm is an unregulated intermediary paying out of its own balance sheet, owning a regulated broker is a materially different structural position. The second was product: FTMO added a 1-Step Challenge alongside the classic 2-Step. The 1-Step trades a single 10% target against a tighter 3% daily limit, a 10% maximum loss that trails the end-of-day balance and a 50% Best Day Rule - and it does not carry the fee refund, though it pays 90% rather than 80%. That refund is the most underrated feature FTMO offers. On the 2-Step, your challenge fee is returned once you pass and take a payout, which means the effective cost for a successful trader is zero. Set against an 80% base split that looks modest next to the 90% now standard among futures firms, the refund closes much of the gap. On the 2-Step, the 10% maximum loss is static - fixed to your starting balance rather than trailing your profits - which is the more forgiving structure; both limits are measured on equity, so open losses count.

FTMO is as close to a safe assumption as prop trading offers. It has operated at scale for years under continuous public scrutiny, publishes detailed rules, processes payouts in roughly eight hours with no withdrawal fees, and in December 2025 acquired OANDA, bringing part of its operation under NFA regulation. That last point deserves weight: most prop firms are unregulated intermediaries, and owning a regulated broker changes the structural risk profile rather than just the marketing. The criticism FTMO attracts is that its rules are demanding - a 5% daily loss limit is unforgiving, and the 1-Step's 3% daily limit more so - not that it fails to pay.

Take the 2-Step, not the 1-Step. That single decision is worth more than any trading advice on this page, for two reasons: the 2-Step refunds your challenge fee once you pass and take a payout, making it effectively free, and its 5% daily drawdown gives you meaningfully more room than the 1-Step's 3%. The 1-Step looks simpler and is more expensive in every way that matters. Once you are in, build your risk around the daily limit rather than the maximum loss. The 5% daily cap is what ends most FTMO challenges - traders plan against the 10% overall figure, take two bad trades in one session and breach before the overall drawdown is ever threatened. Risk no more than 1% per trade and cap yourself at two losses a day, and the daily limit stops being a live risk. Remember that both limits are measured on equity: an open position sitting underwater counts against the daily limit before you close it, so a stop loss is what protects the account, not the closing decision. The daily limit is measured from that day's starting balance at midnight CE(S)T, so a profitable morning does not widen it. Each phase needs at least four trading days; Phase 1 needs 10% and Phase 2 halves it to 5%, and neither has a time limit, so slow down once you reach Phase 2. There is no clock and no reason to force trades. Once funded on the 2-Step, you start at an 80% split with a defined path to 90%, payouts run on a 14-day cycle and process in about eight hours with no fees. Take your first payout as soon as you qualify - that is what triggers the refund of your original challenge fee.